![]() For instance, probing and clarifying the questions and their answers cannot be distorted by the respondents’ reading level, which allows for assessing a wide area of psychopathology categorically or dimensionally and accurately capturing the multifactorial nature of psychopathology. Semi-structured interviews, such as the SCID, have several advantages over paper-pencil questionnaires. Therefore, since DSM is the most widely used interview structure in adult psychopathology and availability of several revisions of DSM-5, assessing the reliability and validity of the DSM-5 diagnosis is of crucial importance. To assess the reliability of the DSM-5, a selection of DSM-5 categorical diagnoses was used in a field trial, and it was found that most diagnoses with an adequate sample size had a good to very good reliability. The workgroup who proposed the diagnostic criteria confirmed the face and construct validity of the DSM-5 ( 6). Besides, by adding specifiers for “not otherwise specified” (NOS) and other categories, supplementing the DSM categorical system with dimensions, and expansion of categories, its clinical utility was expanded ( 1, 3). In line with the goal of Research Domain Criteria launched by the National Institute of Mental Health and to address the above-mentioned limitations, the following items were added to the DSM-5: possible shared etiologies, subthreshold symptoms, and cross-cutting symptoms. To this aim, evidence from clinical practice, neurological, genetic literature, epidemiological findings, cognitive neuroscience, and pathophysiology, which yielded important insights about pathology, particularly treat debilitation cases, were used ( 1). ![]() Accordingly, for more than a decade, the DSM workgroup was developing the DSM-5. Further, clinicians should know how to increase clinical utility while addressing the shortcomings of previous versions of the DSM, including high comorbidity rates, the exclusive emphasis on categorical classification, a need for incorporating a dimensional approach, and the excessive use of “not otherwise specified” ( 3- 5). Moreover, in-depth information improves treatment planning and monitoring that in turn, enhances the reliability and validity of the diagnostic nosology. ![]() To conduct better assessments, clinicians should obtain more in-depth information. Despite its limitations, DSM is a valuable instrument for both practice and research purposes ( 2). Besides, the evolution of each edition of DSM (DSM-1 to DSM-5) indicates a trend toward addressing the limitations of the previous versions ( 1). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), as a semi-structured interview mainly intended to facilitate communications among professionals. In general, the Persian translation of SCID-5-RV represented acceptable reliability and validity for various categorical diagnoses in different clinical settings.Īssessment Diagnostic Interview Psychometrics Properties Psychological Disorders 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |